Found 3 Hypotheses across 1 Pages (0.001 seconds)
  1. Shame, upset, anger, and conflict will be positively correlated to loaning/giving water.Wutich, Amber - Water sharing is a distressing form of reciprocity: Shame, upset, anger, and..., 2022 - 5 Variables

    This paper investigates the emotional and social outcomes of water sharing within societies and suggests water sharing is a unique reciprocity act that results in negative emotional outcomes, rather than the usual prestige and rank. A questionnaire regarding water sharing and receiving was carried out across 20 sites, targeting 250 houses per community. The authors found that both water sharing and receiving resulted in more distress and conflict than those who shared less.

    Related HypothesesCite
  2. Shame, upset, anger, and conflict will be positively correlated to borrowing/receiving water. Wutich, Amber - Water sharing is a distressing form of reciprocity: Shame, upset, anger, and..., 2022 - 5 Variables

    This paper investigates the emotional and social outcomes of water sharing within societies and suggests water sharing is a unique reciprocity act that results in negative emotional outcomes, rather than the usual prestige and rank. A questionnaire regarding water sharing and receiving was carried out across 20 sites, targeting 250 houses per community. The authors found that both water sharing and receiving resulted in more distress and conflict than those who shared less.

    Related HypothesesCite
  3. Households that neither gave or received water in the past 4 weeks have lower odds of reporting shame, upset, anger, or conflict than households that did one or both.Wutich, Amber - Water sharing is a distressing form of reciprocity: Shame, upset, anger, and..., 2022 - 6 Variables

    This paper investigates the emotional and social outcomes of water sharing within societies and suggests water sharing is a unique reciprocity act that results in negative emotional outcomes, rather than the usual prestige and rank. A questionnaire regarding water sharing and receiving was carried out across 20 sites, targeting 250 houses per community. The authors found that both water sharing and receiving resulted in more distress and conflict than those who shared less.

    Related HypothesesCite